X031 SOM track Assistant Professor reappointment

A four-year reappointment normally follows the initial four-year term.

Appointment proposal--The department will prepare and submit a recommendation for the appointment that is due at the Office of Academic Affairs in the EXPECTED FORMAT by the announced deadlines, reviewed by OAA for completeness, reviewed by the Committee on the Reappointment of Assistant Professors (COROAP), endorsed by the Dean and submitted to the Provost’s office for approval. An original recommendation should be submitted to OAA at the time of the COROAP meeting.

Components:

_____Updated CV & personal statements MS Word 

_____Up to 5 exemplary scholarly works or manuscripts if these are a part of the job description

_____Chair’s letter to Dean  MS Word 

_____Draft 'Letter to the Candidate', normally specifying a target date for promotion, year-by-year expectations for recommended reappointment, and a contingency plan.

_____ Letter of assessment from BSCD Master or documentation that one has been requested (for Basic Science Departments and/or if candidate teaches in The College) 

_____Teaching evaluations

_____ Other concurrences,* and documents as customary for a department.  These might include Section Chiefs' letters and reports of internal promotions committees.

THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE COMBINED IN THE EXPECTED FORMAT AND SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO OAA BY THE ANNOUNCED DEADLINE.  ORDINARILY PAPER COPIES ARE DUE AT THE TIME OF THE COROAP MEETING.

_____ BSCD routing sheet for College appointment (Basic Science Departments only) MS Word

Post-approval/Payroll—Upon approval of reappointment and attending privileges, the department should follow all the Work Day steps to ensure all required forms are uploaded completely and correctly. Work Day Reference Guide.  All required actions must be completed by the WD payroll deadline to guarantee a paycheck at the end of the month.

 

 

*When a faculty member is appointed in more than one department, normally one is primary and the others are secondary.  The primary department assesses overall academic performance and recommends an action to the Dean and Provost.  Secondary BSD departments assess the contribution to the secondary departments and vote on this basis to concur with the recommendation of the primary department.  Concurrence is also required when the secondary appointment is in a non-BSD department, School, Institute for Molecular Engineering, or in an interdivisional institute.  The Cancer Center and any secondary unit providing resources essential to the proposed appointment should also concur.  Ph.D.-granting Committees need not concur in cases involving an existing member, although they may do so.  New secondary appointments to Ph.D.-granting Committees require a faculty vote.